<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Magic Echo Chamber &#187; e-ink</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/tag/e-ink/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidforbes.net</link>
	<description>The website of David Forbes, writer of weird novels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Kindles, iPads, and cell phones (oh my!)</title>
		<link>http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/536</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/536#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Forbes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidforbes.net/?p=536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="margin:5px 0px 5px 0px" id="linksalpha_tag_1510300780" class="linksalpha-email-button" data-url="http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/536" data-text="Kindles, iPads, and cell phones (oh my!)" data-desc="I've been thinking a lot lately about the Kindle and iPad and what the latter's introduction into the marketplace will do to the former. I talked about it a little bit in my post when the iPad was introduced, and in the comments section there. There is some understandable defensiveness from those who have purchased a Kindle or Nook or are planning to do so about my assertion that "I really don’t expect either of those devices to exist for more than a couple of years at this point. Apple is sim" data-image="http://www.davidforbes.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cell_phone_with_pic-300x300.jpg" data-site="The Magic Echo Chamber"></div><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.linksalpha.com/social/loader?script_type=buttons_counters&tag_id=linksalpha_tag_1510300780&link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.davidforbes.net%2Farchives%2F536&gplus=1&twitter=1&fblike=1&linkedin=1&gbuzz=0&tumblr=0&reddit=0&pinterest=0&digg=0&stumbleupon=0&gpluslang=en-US&twitterlang=en&fblikelang=en_US&gbuzzlang=en&fblikeverb=like&fblikefont=arial&fblikeref=linksalpha&gplusctr=1&twitterctr=1&linkedinctr=1&gbuzzctr=1&redditctr=1&pinterestctr=1&diggctr=1&stumbleuponctr=1&twittermention=&twitterrelated1=&twitterrelated2=&halign=center"></script><p>I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot lately about the Kindle and iPad and what the latter&#8217;s introduction into the marketplace will do to the former. I talked about it a little bit in my post <a href="http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/486">when the iPad was introduced</a>, and in the comments section there. There is some understandable defensiveness from those who have purchased a Kindle or Nook or are planning to do so about my assertion that &#8220;I really don’t expect either of those devices to exist for more than a couple of years at this point. Apple is simply too good with content delivery.&#8221; For Kindle and Nook fans, those are fighting words!</p>
<p>I want to be clear that I&#8217;m not rooting <em>against </em>dedicated eReaders &#8212; I&#8217;m very much technology agnostic. I go for whatever&#8217;s best for <em>me</em> (as do we all). I don&#8217;t like e-ink, I <em>want </em>backlighting, and I want a multipurpose device. Ergo, a dedicated eReader <em>as they currently exist</em> is out. I also think the software on the Kindle&#8217;s I&#8217;ve played with (I haven&#8217;t used a Nook yet) is clunky and awkward and far too inelegant for my taste. But for many of people it&#8217;s become a great way to read books, and I&#8217;m certainly not ever against that.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I am pretty sure of: the iPad (or similar multi-purpose devices with e-reading as a feature set) will do two things: 1) force the price of dedicated eReaders way down the pricing curve, and 2) relegate them into niche status.</p>
<p>The Kindle and Nook fans disagree. So what basis do I have for this assertion that multi-purpose devices crowd out single-purpose devices?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.davidforbes.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cell_phone_with_pic.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-548" title="cell_phone_with_pic" src="http://www.davidforbes.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cell_phone_with_pic-300x300.jpg" alt="" width="113" height="113" /></a>The cell phone.</p>
<p>Cell phones were originally portable phones and nothing more; a way to roam free from the landlines that had everyone stretching curled cords throughout their houses in order to move around while talking. Mobility was just a dream &#8212; that&#8217;s why pay phones were ubiquitous. If you were in a public place, you <em>had </em>to use a pay phone.</p>
<p>But over time, more and more functionality was added to cell phones. I thought texting was idiotic when I first heard about it. Why the hell would you want to <em>type </em>on such a small thing when you can just call the goddamn person?! But now I text more than I use the actual telephony portion of my phone. I have friends whose teenage kids make ten to twenty <em>thousand </em>texts per month. (Yes, they all have unlimited texting plans). It&#8217;s now their primary method of communication. Telephony is now a secondary product on a <em>phone</em>.</p>
<p>We now have cameras on phones. Quality&#8217;s not the best, but you don&#8217;t need to carry a digital camera if you don&#8217;t want to. Sure, a digital camera (or, heaven forbid, actual <em>film </em>camera) can take better pictures than a cell phone camera, but there&#8217;s a convenience factor that&#8217;s hard to ignore. Snap a photo and with a few clicks you can text it to your friends or Flickr or Facebook wall, or all three.</p>
<p>Over time, more and more functionality crept into our phones. Web browsing, email access, GPS, video recording, and yes, ebook reading. They evolved into multi-function devices. Single purpose cell phones are pretty much extinct. Even the most basic, no-frills phones still come with texting and cameras. You have to look pretty hard to find phones that <em>don&#8217;t</em> have these features.</p>
<p>I expect those same pressures to come to bear on dedicated ebook readers. Either they&#8217;re going to have to add functionality and spin up into devices similar to the iPad, or they&#8217;ll have to become so cheap that they&#8217;re almost a throwaway purchase, probably $20 or so. Without one of those scenarios happening, I just don&#8217;t see their long term viability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidforbes.net/archives/536/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

